Skip to main content
← Back to blog
fees

Is a 1% AUM Fee Worth It?

The most common way advisers get paid is a percentage of the assets they manage for you, and 1% a year is the figure most often quoted.

One percent. Sounds small. But here's what it actually means in dollars — and why the number the industry advertises isn't the number that matters.

What 1% actually costs at different portfolio sizes

Let's start with the math most advisors won't hand you in a spreadsheet.

At $1 million in investable assets, 1% AUM = $10,000 per year, or about $833 per month.

At $5 million, it's $50,000 per year. $4,167 per month.

At $10 million, it's $100,000 per year. $8,333 per month.

These are your year-one numbers. The problem is that AUM fees don't stay at year-one levels. As your portfolio grows — which is the whole point of investing — your fee grows with it.

The part the percentage hides

Those are year-one numbers, and year one is the smallest the bill will ever be. An AUM fee is indexed to the size of your portfolio, so it rises every year the portfolio does. Over a long relationship the cumulative figure gets large, and the money that leaves the portfolio to pay it stops compounding for you.

I'm deliberately not going to put a projected thirty-year total on this page. Any such number depends entirely on an assumed rate of return, and a number built on an assumption I picked would tell you more about the assumption than about the fee. If you want to see it for your own situation, the arithmetic is simple enough to run in a spreadsheet in ten minutes, and I'm happy to walk through it with you using your actual balances rather than mine.

What you can see without any assumption at all is the structure.

So is 1% ever worth it?

The question isn't just what you pay. It's what you get.

An AUM fee structure pays the advisor more as your portfolio grows, regardless of whether their advice got better or their workload increased. If you go from $5M to $8M partly because the market ran up 40%, your advisor's compensation went up 60% for doing nothing different. That's a structural misalignment.

A fee-only, flat-fee adviser gets paid the same whether markets are up or down that year. Their incentive is the quality of the advice — not the size of the account.

That said, a 1% AUM advisor who does genuinely comprehensive planning — tax strategy, estate coordination, business exit planning, behavioral coaching through market panics — delivers more value than a 1% AUM advisor who mostly just rebalances a model portfolio twice a year. The fee model doesn't tell you the quality of the advice.

What the fee model does tell you is who the advisor is structurally incentivized to serve.

The $1M inflection point

Here's the counterintuitive part that most flat-fee advisors won't admit: at $1 million in investable assets, a flat-fee model isn't necessarily cheaper.

At Wealth In Yourself, our fee at $1M works out to about $15,000 per year ($1,250 per month). A 1% AUM advisor at $1M would charge $10,000 per year. We cost more in year one at that asset level — because our $15,000 annual minimum reflects the actual cost of genuine comprehensive planning, regardless of portfolio size.

The break-even is around $1.5M, where our declining-tier structure brings the flat fee below what 1% AUM would charge. Above $5M, the difference becomes significant — and above $10M, it's material.

If you have $5M or more in investable assets, a flat-fee model is almost certainly cheaper than 1% AUM in direct fees alone — before accounting for the portfolio benefit of keeping those fees invested.

What to ask your advisor

Whether you're working with a flat-fee advisor or evaluating an AUM-based one, these questions cut to the core:

  1. What do I pay you in dollars this year? Not in percent — in dollars.
  2. How does that number change if my portfolio doubles? (At 1% AUM, it doubles too.)
  3. What specifically do I get for that fee? List the deliverables — meetings, plans, tax coordination, estate review.
  4. Are you a fiduciary, in writing, at all times? Not "sometimes" or "when acting as an investment adviser."
  5. Do you earn any commissions or referral fees from any product you recommend? If yes: from what, how much, and how does it affect what you recommend?

The goal isn't to find the cheapest advisor. It's to find the one whose incentives are aligned with your outcome — and who can show you the actual math on what you're paying.


Fee figures above are current published WIY pricing: a flat annual fee based on investable net worth, subject to a $15,000 annual minimum, reassessed each year. Comparison figures for a 1% AUM arrangement are simple arithmetic on a stated rate, not a projection, and contain no assumed rate of return. Educational only, not personalized advice. Wealth In Yourself is a Nevada-registered investment adviser. Full fee schedule at wealthinyourself.com/pricing.

Educational content only. Not financial, tax, or legal advice. This post reflects the views of Joshua St. Laurent as of the publish date and is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Illustrations and numbers are hypothetical; your situation is unique. Consult a qualified fiduciary advisor before making financial decisions. Wealth In Yourself LLC is a Registered Investment Adviser with the State of Nevada.

J

Joshua St. Laurent, MS, CFP®, CFT™, APFC®, ACC

Founder of Wealth In Yourself. Flat-fee fiduciary for entrepreneurs, RE investors, and people building life on their own terms. Based at Lake Tahoe.

Want to talk about how this applies to your situation?

15 minutes. No pitch. Just a real conversation about what you’re building.

Book your free intro call

Get this in your inbox every week

One idea about money, planning, or the advisory industry — written by Josh, not a marketing team. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe on Substack